Need Expert Legal Representation?

Forry Ullman was founded in 1921 and serves individual, business, and corporate clients in all areas of legal practice. We understand that the client expects more than the consistent delivery of sound legal advice. Our lawyers demonstrate an interest in and broad understanding of our clients’ business needs. We partner with the client to manage its legal risks in a manner that achieves its business goals.

Ready to take the next step? Contact us today for a confidential consultation and let us put our expertise to work for you.

Contact Us

Areas of Focus Include:

Bad Faith

Commercial Litigation

Construction Litigation

Coverage

First Party PIP / MPC

Fraud / SIU

General Liability

Premises Liability

Products Liability

Third Party

UM/UIM

Federal Court Weighs in on Ride Share UM/UIM Coverage

In a recent opinion, the Federal Court for the Eastern District of PA ruled in favor of a Lyft driver, resolving a dispute over uninsured motorist (UM) coverage in Ahtasham v. Lyft, Inc., No. 2:24-CV-01673-GJP (E.D. Pa. Pappert, J.) The case centered around a...

Supreme Court Upholds the Regular Use Exclusion

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Rush v. Erie Insurance Exchange, No 77, MAP 2022 (Pa. Jan. 29, 2024) (Maj. Op. by Donahue, J.) (Concurring Op. by Wecht, J.) upheld the validity of the Regular Use Exclusion and ruled that, as presented in this case, the Regular...

Eastern District Weighs In On Service

In London-Walker v. Walgreens Family of Cos., No. 23-CV-2868 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 4, 2023), Judge Kenney from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania considered whether timely service of a Writ of Summons on the third-party administrator representative for Defendant...

Third Circuit Confirms There Is No Requirement For A New Sec. 1734 Form Requesting Lower UM/UIM Limits When A Vehicle Is Added To An Existing Policy

In Geist v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 49 F.4th 861 (3rd Cir. Sept. 29, 2022, Randel, C.J.), the Third Circuit Court of Appeals considered whether a selection of lower UIM limits form under Section 1734 was required when an additional vehicle was added to an...

Expert Testimony Not Required In Cases Where Causation Is “Obvious”

The Middle District of Pennsylvania recently held in Bixler v. Lamendola (Civil Action 3:20-CV-1819, M.D. Pa., July 5, 2022) that expert medical testimony was not required to prove the causal relationship between the trauma sustained and an alleged resulting injury in...

Experienced Attorneys

Our team brings a wealth of knowledge and personalized service to meet your needs.

Locations to Serve

Our firm proudly serves clients from three convenient locations: Bethlehem, King of Prussia, and Reading. Whether you’re in the Lehigh Valley, the Philadelphia suburbs, or the greater Reading area, our team is committed to delivering exceptional legal services close to you.

Years In Business

Forry Ullman has a proven track record of success. Our firm excels in defending complex litigation and is dedicated to delivering outstanding service. A key element of our practice is the personalized attention and meticulous care we provide, which consistently leads to favorable outcomes.

Trial Victory for Amy N. Gampico

Trial Victory for Jennifer Stauffer

Another Trial Win for Paul Gambone

Need Expert Legal Representation?

Areas of Focus Include:

Federal Court Weighs in on Ride Share UM/UIM Coverage

Supreme Court Upholds the Regular Use Exclusion

Eastern District Weighs In On Service

Third Circuit Confirms There Is No Requirement For A New Sec. 1734 Form Requesting Lower UM/UIM Limits When A Vehicle Is Added To An Existing Policy

Expert Testimony Not Required In Cases Where Causation Is “Obvious”

Experienced Attorneys

Locations to Serve

Years In Business

Get In Touch

Our Offices

Bethlehem

King of Prussia

Reading