In a recent opinion, the Federal Court for the Eastern District of PA ruled in favor of a Lyft driver, resolving a dispute over uninsured motorist (UM) coverage in Ahtasham v. Lyft, Inc., No. 2:24-CV-01673-GJP (E.D. Pa. Pappert, J.) The case centered around a...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d11f/3d11f92803fab1ea8db7c30b6ada967474210651" alt="Federal Court Weighs in on Ride Share UM/UIM Coverage"